In a sort of introduction to the book version of Journey of Faith: From Jerusalem to the Promised Land, S. Kent Brown tells a short, little-known story about an experience
he had while working at the BYU Jerusalem Center in April of 1996.
My friend, the late Charles E. Smith of Simon and Schuster Publishers, came to my office and brought a close associate, Mr. Emanuel Hausman, who was the president of Carta, the publisher of the most important atlases and maps of the Bible. During our conversation, unexpectedly, Mr. Hausman said, “I think that you ought to write an atlas of the Book of Mormon. I have read the Book of Mormon and believe that it is possible to create a series of maps for it. Carta would be willing to publish such an atlas.” I tried to hide my surprise. The thought darted quickly through my mind: “You just heard the publisher of the most distinguished series of atlases on the Bible say that he would be willing to work on an atlas of the Book of Mormon. Unbelievable.” (p. 2)
Brown mentions this only in passing, as it served as the
first in a series of events that eventually lead to something very different:
the Journey of Faith film. Brown is
not clear whatever became of that project itself, but given that 20 years later
nothing like that has been published, it is safe to say that it ended up not
going anywhere. Still, I do not think that makes Brown’s initial thought any
less relevant: the publisher of the most distinguished series of atlases on the
Bible was willing to publish a similar set of atlases on the Book of Mormon. This is nothing that will make headlines 20 years later, but it is an example—and small
one, to be sure—of a reputable non-LDS publisher taking work on Book of Mormon
geography seriously. I guess Book of Mormon geography is not a TOTAL laughingstock among non-Mormons.
Problem is the maps would be made of the wrong area for the BoM
ReplyDeleteMiles,
DeleteIt is not clear to me why you think you can make that judgement. I mean, nothing in my post, nor in the anecdote, indicates where they would have made the maps for. And even if it did, I don't see how you can be so sure that it is the wrong place. There is no revelation on the subject. So, I see no reason why you should be able to declare with utter certainty that any particular map is the wrong place. Such an assertion first requires a specific places to declare wrong, and it needs a reasoned argument as to why it was wrong.