Skip to main content

Why I am Excited for the 2013 FAIR Conference

Well, it is that time of year again! The FAIR Conference is just around the corner, and I thought I would take a few minutes to talk about what I am excited for in this year’s conference. And believe me, there is a lot to be excited for in this year’s line-up.

First, FAIR is doing a few things different this year, and I am not just talking about the new location (which I am excited about, since it is closer to home for me, and it looks like a very nice venue). They are doing two panel discussions on what seem to me very timely issues. One, on the first day, about Mormon Feminism, and another, on the second day, on the “faith crisis” that has become a major talking point in the Mormon internet community these days. 

Panelist for the first discussion will include Valarie Hudson, an internationally renowned feminist, widely published political scientist, and was recently published in the Ensign; Wendy Ulrich, an accomplished psychologist (PhD), business woman, and author of LDS books; Neylan McBain, founder and editor of the non-profit Mormon Women Project, a business woman, and religion writer in both major national outlets and LDS venues; Kris Fredrickson, who teaches (at BYU and UVU) and publishes on Women’s studies, religion, and history; and Maxine Hanks – one of the infamous “September Six.” Yes, this panel is full of some heavy hitters. If you are interested in issues related to women and the Church, you will not want to miss this!

The faith crisis panel looks to be equally exciting, featuring, again, Maxine Hanks, who recently returned to the Church after being excommunicated (with 5 other intellectuals) in September 1993; as well as Don Bradley, a brilliant Mormon historian who first lost his faith through history and then regained it; Bill Reel, a convert and Bishop who went through a faith crisis and now hosts a podcast meant to help others through similar struggles; and Janet L. Eyring. These are all people who have lost their faith and then found their way back. Again, if you or someone you know is currently struggling with their faith in the gospel, this panel is going to be a must hear experience!

While FAIR has done panel discussions in the past, this will be the first time they have done any since I have been attending the conference (my first time was 2010), I am excited to be there for these important and timely discussions.

Besides participating on the two panel’s, Maxine Hanks will also be giving a presentation titled “Working With the Church: Another Narrative.” As one of the famed September Six who are often held up as “Exhibit A” of the evidence that the Church is anti-intellectual, I am very interested in seeing what she has to say about her experience.

Another speaker that peaks my interest is Seth Payne. Payne is a lifelong member of the Church, but he openly admits to not believing in the founding stories of the restoration. Nonetheless, he remains active and interested in the Church, and is presenting on “Why Mormonism Matters: Pastoral Apologetics and the LDS Doubter,” another presentation that I think should be of interest to those who are either struggling or know others who are struggling with doubt.

Ralph Hancock, a very impressive conservative thinker and commenter on religion and politics, will discuss the necessity of political apologetics in light of Mormonism and the new liberalism. Given my political science background, I am very interested to see what he has to say. This year will also feature humor columnist Robert Kirby, writer for the Salt Lake Tribune, who will talk about why we Mormons should be willing to laugh at ourselves. I’ve been told that Kirby is a very good and very popular public speaker, so this should be a very good presentation.

This year’s slate doesn’t just feature some of these interesting “outside-the-box” type presentations. There are also a number of solid presenters covering topics people have come to expect from FAIR. Don Bradley will discuss the historical setting and context on the First Vision – and I can promise you, he has something new and worthwhile to say on this topic. Ron Barney, Executive Director of the Mormon History Association and former Church Archivist, will also discuss Joseph Smith’s visions, and Lynne Wilson, who has an MA in Religious Studies and a PhD in Theology and American History will also discuss Joseph Smith in context of the Second Great Awakening. Having recently switched my major to History, and being very interested in Joseph Smith, these are some of the presentations I most look forward too. Others interested in Church history should also be eager to hear what these well researched scholars have to say about Joseph Smith and his history.

With all of that said, the Book of Mormon has always been my number one interest, and with that comes an interest in understanding how the Book of Mormon relates to the real world. With that in mind, one of the presentations I am most eager to hear is Mark Wright’s, on role of the “heartland” in the Book of Mormon.

This doesn’t cover all the presentations for this year, but gives you a good sampling. You can see the full line-up and speaker bio’s on the FAIR website. It is going to be an exciting conference this year, and I would encourage anyone with an interest in the topics I have mentioned here, or any of the other topics being covered by this year’s speakers, to attend. The conference will be on August 1-2 (a Thursday and a Friday) from about 8:00am to 5:30pm both days. Tickets can be purchased through the FAIR Bookstore, with the option of getting lunch included (which can be pretty convenient). If you can’t attend for whatever reason, there is also online streaming available. 


Popular posts from this blog

Nephite History in Context 4: The Iron Dagger of King Tutankhamun

Editor’s Note: This is the fourth contribution to my new series Nephite History in Context: Artifacts, Inscriptions, and Texts Relevant to the Book of Mormon. Check out the really cool (and official, citable) PDF version here. To learn more about this series, read the introduction here. To find other posts in the series, see here.
The Iron Dagger of King Tutankhamun
The discovery of King Tutankhamun’s tomb in 1922 was a worldwide sensation, and to this day is widely regarded as one of the greatest archaeological discoveries of all-time due to the veritable treasure trove of artifacts found inside. The treasure was so great that to this day many of the items have yet to be studied. Likewise, Tutankhamun (ca. 1336–1327 bc) remains the best-known Pharaoh of Egypt in popular culture today, but details about his actual reign and accomplishments are still generally unknown among the public. Some are aware that he ascended to the throne as a mere child, about 8 years old, but few r…

Nephite History in Context 3: Vered Jericho Sword

Editor’s Note: This is the third contribution to my new series Nephite History in Context: Artifacts, Inscriptions, and Texts Relevant to the Book of Mormon. Check out the really cool (and official, citable) PDF version here. To learn more about this series, read the introduction here. To find other posts in the series, see here.
Vered Jericho Sword
Vered Jericho was a small ancient Israelite fortress first excavated in the winter of 1982 by archaeologist Avraham Eitan. It’s located roughly 3.7 miles (6 km) south of Jericho proper, on the northern side of Wadi es-Suweid. The walls still stand over 6 and half feet tall (2 m) and nearly 3 feet (0.9 m) wide, with two towers on each corner flanking the gate. Inside the fort is a courtyard and two dwelling structures. The fort may have also had cultic or ritual functions as a “high place” (beit bamah). It dates to the late seventh to early sixth century BC, and was destroyed by fire, quite likely in either the Babylonian siege of …

Responding to the New Video on Nahom as Archaeological Evidence for the Book of Mormon

Many of my (few) readers have probably already seen the new video by Book of Mormon Central on Nahom as archaeological evidence for the Book of Mormon, starring my good friend (and co-author on a related paper) Stephen Smoot. If you haven’t, check it out:

As usual, comments sections wherever this video is shared have been flooded by Internet ex-Mormons insisting this not evidence for the Book of Mormon. I’ve actually had a few productive conversations with some reasonable people who don’t think Nahom is, by itself, compelling evidence—and I can understand that. But the insistence that Nahom is not evidence at all is just, frankly, absurd. So I’ll just go ahead and preempt about 90% of future responses to this post by responding to the most common arguments against Nahom/NHM now:
1. The Book of Mormon is false, therefore there can be no evidence, therefore this is not evidence. First, this is circular reasoning. It assumes the conclusion (Book of Mormon is false) which the evidence pre…