Skip to main content


            Compared to most issues, this issue is rather small. It features only seven reviews/essays. Despite its size, this issue has a lot to offer. Five of the seven articles are recommended, and each was very good. A lot of emphasis seems to be on science this time around, with one review and an essay discussing the relationship of science and Mormonism (well, if you count intelligent design as a science). The others discuss pretty standard topics for the Review, i.e. theology, evangelical anti-Mormonism, apologetics, etc.

Recommended Reading

            Daniel C. Peterson, “Editor’sIntorduction – The Witchcraft Paradigm: On Claims to ‘Second Sight’ by PeopleWho Say It Doesn’t Exist,” pg. ix-lxiv: In what is one of my favorite Ed. Intro.’s by Peterson, he offers an “apology (defense) for apologetics,” and also dispels several myths and rumors about FARMS (particularly their peer-review process) that are frequently circulated by anti-Mormon’s and other critics in an effort to dismiss and discredit the organization.

            Robert R. Bennett, “Science vs.Mormonism: The Dangers of Dogmatism and Sloppy Reading,” a review of Duwayne R.Anderson, Farewell to Eden: Coming toTerms with Mormonism and Science (Bloomington, IN: 1st BooksLibrary, 2003), pg. 1-43: Bennett critiques Anderson’s approach to both Mormonism and Science, and touches on each type of science Anderson compares to Mormonism.

            Richard Sherlock, “Mormonism andIntelligent Design,” pg. 45-81: Sherlock has actually recently converted to Catholicism. What impact that may have had on the views he expressed in this article, I do not know. I can’t imagine that his perspective on Design Theory would change simply by switching from one religious belief to another (both of which obviously believe in some sort of design behind the creation of the world), though his views on Design Theory certainly could have changed for other reasons (I’m not sure where ID and other forms of Design Theory stand in the scientific community at this point; when this article was published, proponents of the theory were fighting to win some scientific credibility for the theory; as an aside, I can remember hearing/reading about this controversy my senior year of high school). Despite all that may have changed, however, I still found this to be an informative essay. Sherlock defines what ID theory is, discusses its relationship to science, religion, God, and Mormonism. Throughout, he argues for ID as a science, and he argues that it is something Mormons should be open to and even accepting of.

            David L. Paulsen and Cory G.Walker, “Work, Worship, and Grace,” a review of Dougles J. Davies, The Mormon Culture of Salvation: Force,Grace, and Glory (Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, 2000), pg. 83-177: Looking at the page numbers, this seems like a daunting, 90-plus page review. The review itself, however, actually ends on page 127. The extra 50 pages comprise Appendices A-D, which contain several quotes from LDS leaders, hymns, and scriptures regarding grace and salvation. Thus, these appendices are an invaluable resource for those seeking to understand the LDS view on grace and salvation. The review itself is pretty good as well, as Paulsen and Walker note that they feel that Davies got a few things wrong about how LDS view and understand grace and works, worship, and salvation. They layout how they understand the balance between grace and works to function, and argue that grace has always played an important role in LDS sortiology.  

            Louis Midgley, “Orders of Submission,”a review of essays on Mormonism published in the Southern Baptist Journal of Theology 9/2 (Summer 2005): 1-81, pg.189-228: Midgley compares the SBC’s anti-Mormon campaign in 1998 to a recent issue of their journal to see if any progress has been made. The answer: not much, if any. He also uses this as an opportunity to comment on another group of evangelicals (some of whom cast their lot with the SBC by publishing some essays in the issue of SBJT under review, while others were criticized in said issue) who have delusions of “converting” the entire LDS Church into an evangelical group through the means of “dialogue.”

Final Thoughts

            Though lacking somewhat in overall content when compared to other issues, I found this to be a very good issue. Peterson’s introduction, Sherlock’s discussion of ID, and Paulson and Walkers review of grace in LDS theology are all must-reads in my book. Midgley’s review also provides a very important intellectual history on some of the development in sectarian anti-Mormonism. One thing to note that, although I don’t recommend all seven contributions to this issue, there really wasn’t a single one not worth reading; an overall solid issue.

Rating: 4/5


  1. From reading Sherlock's bio it looks like he never was an active Mormon. Thus I'm happy for him that he's become a devout Catholic.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

“The Dominant Narrative is Not True”: Some Thoughts on Recent Remarks by Richard Bushman

The following is making its rounds on Facebook (from this video): Questioner: In your view do you see room in Mormonism for several narratives of a religious experience or do you think that in order for the Church to remain strong they would have to hold to that dominant narrative?
Richard Bushman: I think that for the Church to remain strong it has to reconstruct its narrative. The dominant narrative is not true; it can’t be sustained. The Church has to absorb all this new information or it will be on very shaky grounds and that's what it is trying to do and it will be a strain for a lot of people, older people especially. But I think it has to change. As I have seen this quote flash across my Facebook news feed and thought about how to make sense of it, I have been reminded of the short essay response questions I would often have on tests or assignments in college or even high school. It would not be uncommon for these questions to be built around a quote from an important schola…

Unpublished Book by John L. Sorenson Now Available Online

Whether critics of the LDS faith know it or not, John L. Sorenson’s work on transoceanic voyaging in pre-Columbian times has garnered considerable respect among at least some non-LDS scholars. His publications on the subject span across six decades, and appear in a variety of peer-reviewed and academic publications, such as El México Antigo, New England Antiquities Research Association Newsletter, Man Across the Sea: Problems of Pre-Columbian Contacts (published by the University of Texas Press), Contact and Exchange in the Ancient World (published by the University of Hawai’i), and Sino-Platonic Papers (published by the University of Pennsylvania).
He has co-published a 2-volume annotated bibliography of the literature on pre-Columbian contacts, which received some positive reviews. He also co-wrote (with a non-Mormon scholar) World Trade and Biological Exchange before 1492, detailing all the biological evidence for transoceanic contact before Columbus. In a letter thanking Sorenso…