Skip to main content


            Sometime ago, I was working on a comprehensive response to the accusation that Mormons are not Christians. It is currently 190 pages in length, and is probably about 55-65 percent complete. Though I still tinker around with it from time-to-time, my interest have generally moved on, and so I don’t know if the rest will ever be written. Though most of it deals with responding to anti-Mormon arguments, one portion, about 30 pages long, elucidates five reasons I think strongly suggest that Mormons are Christians.  Given the recent controversy, brought on by Rev. Jeffress, I thought now would be a good time to draw on some of that content. So, I thought I would do a five part series explaining those reasons. Despite breaking it up into five parts, my arguments have still been considerably condensed.

The name Jesus Christ appears in the official title of the Church

            This is, quite naturally, the very first argument most members make when faced with this accusation. The name of the Church is the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints! How much more obvious could it get. Of course, merely stating the name of the Church rarely convinces the persistent critic, who will insist the “Just because you call yourselves ‘The Church of Jesus Christ’ doesn’t mean you are the church of Jesus Christ.” While it is true, just calling oneself the church of Jesus Christ does not automatically make one His Church, anymore than me claiming I’m Jimmer Fredette makes it so. But that is not the point. The implications of using the name of Jesus Christ in the title of our church should be obvious to our claims of being Christians. Would a non-Christian Church put the name of Jesus Christ in its official Church title? The answer to that question should be obvious, which is why the name of our Church is the very first thing we point to when defending our claim to being a part of Christianity – because it is plainly obvious that we are Christians by virtue of the name of our Church.  Jan Shipps, a non-Mormon who has spent over 40 years studying the Church of Jesus Christ, explained that when she is asked to speak at different church groups on Mormonism, “The task I set for myself in such situations is not merely connecting Mormonism to Christianity – after all, I am talking about a church of Jesus Christ.”[1] It seems the implications of our name are just as obvious to her.

The name of the Church in the Bible

            Calling the Church after Jesus Christ is in keeping with the New Testament, which says that the Church is His church (see Matt. 16:18) and identifies Christ as the head of the Church (see Eph. 1:22; 5:23; Col.1:18). Paul refers to the Church as the “body of Christ” (see 1 Cor.12:27; Eph. 4:12; Rom. 12:5), and calls the people in the church, “members of Christ” (1 Cor. 6:15). On one occasion, Paul speaks of “the church by Christ Jesus” (Eph. 3:21), while at another time he speaks of the “church of the firstborn” (Heb. 12:23), who, of course, is Christ (cf. Rom. 8:29; Col. 1:15; Heb 1:6). While the Church is most frequently called “the church of God” in the New Testament, such a name could very well refer to Jesus Christ, as is obviously the case when Paul speaks of “the church of God, which he hath purchased with his own blood(Acts 20:28). Elsewhere Paul makes clear that it is Jesus Christ who acts as the “chief cornerstone” to the “household of God” (Eph. 2:19-20).

            When Paul heard that there had been divisions among the Corinthians because some were calling themselves after himself and other apostles, Paul responded by making clear that the Church is not of Paul, nor of Apollos, nor of Cephas (Peter), but that the Church is of Christ, and should not be called after any other name (see 1 Cor. 1:10-13; 3:21-23). 

            Though the individual congregations of the Church are often called after the city or region they are in (not at all unlike Mormon wards and branches today), they are still frequently tied back to being in Christ or of God (see Gal. 1:22; 1 Thess. 2:14; 1 Cor. 1:2; 1 Thess. 1:1; 2 Thess. 1:1). The collective congregations (churches) of the church are were once called “the churches of Christ” (Rom. 16:16), while at another time they are identified as “the churches of the saints” (1 Cor. 14:33). Together, these two references support calling the church after both Jesus Christ, and the members (the saints), just as we get in the name of the LDS Church today: The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

            Of course, none of this is to say there was an “official title” of the Church in biblical times. My point is only to illustrate that the early Church was clearly understood to be Christ’s church (or the church of Jesus Christ) and the saints clearly associated the church with Christ’s name.

Conclusion of Part 1

            The early Christians clearly called the Church after the name of Jesus Christ, just as Latter-day Saints do today. Thus, I suggest that Mormons are Christians because their Church is called after the name of Jesus Christ, which is not only an obvious sign of Christianity, but is also well within the established practice of the New Testament.

Other Reasons

Christian Covenants 


Popular posts from this blog

Nephite History in Context 1: Jerusalem Chronicle

Editor’s Note: This is the first contribution to my new series Nephite History in Context: Artifacts, Inscriptions, and Texts Relevant to the Book of Mormon. Check out the really cool (and official, citable) PDF version here. To learn more about this series, read the introduction here. To find other posts in the series, see here
Jerusalem Chronicle (ABC 5/BM 21946)
The so-called “Babylonian Chronicles” are an important collection of brief historical reports from Mesopotamia, found in Iraq in the late-19th century.1 They are written on clay tablets in Akkadian using cuneiform script, and cover much of the first millennium BC, although several tablets are missing or severely damaged, leaving gaps in the record. One tablet, colloquially known as the “Jerusalem Chronicle” (ABC 5/BM 21946),2 provides brief annal-like reports of the early reign of Nebuchadrezzar II (biblical Nebuchadnezzar), including mention of his invasion of Jerusalem.
Biblical sources report that King Jehoiac…

Nephite History in Context 2a: Apocryphon of Jeremiah

Editor’s Note: This is the first part of the second contribution to my new series Nephite History in Context: Artifacts, Inscriptions, and Texts Relevant to the Book of Mormon. Check out the really cool (and official, citable) PDF version here. To learn more about this series, read the introduction here. To find other posts in the series, see here
Apocryphon of Jeremiah (4Q385a)
Between 1947 and 1956, a few well preserved scrolls and tens of thousands of broken fragments were found scattered across eleven different caves along the northwest shores of the Dead Sea near Qumran. Now known as the Dead Sea Scrolls, they are arguably the most significant discovery ever made for the study of the Bible and the origins of Judaism and Christianity. Among the writings found are the earliest copies of nearly every Old Testament book, many of the known apocryphal and pseudepigraphic works, and several other texts discovered for the first time at Qumran. Altogether, more than 900 differe…

Nephite History in Context 2b: Letters of ʿAbdu-Ḫeba of Jerusalem (EA 285–290)

Editor’s Note: This is the second part of the second contribution to my new series Nephite History in Context: Artifacts, Inscriptions, and Texts Relevant to the Book of Mormon. Check out the really cool (and official, citable) PDF version here. To learn more about this series, read the introduction here. To find other posts in the series, see here.
Letters of ʿAbdu-Ḫeba of Jerusalem (EA 285–290)
The Amarna Letters make up the bulk of the 382 cuneiform tablets found at Amarna, Egypt in 1887. The letters date to the mid-fourteenth century BC (ca. 1365–1335 bc), with most of them coming from the reign of Akhenaten (ca. 1352–1336 bc), though some date to the reigns of Amenhotep III (ca. 1390–1352 bc) and perhaps Smenkhkara (ca. 1338–1336 bc) and Tutankhamun (ca. 1336–1327 bc). The collection includes international correspondence between Egypt and other nations, such as Assyria and Babylonia, but most of the letters are to and from vassal kings in the Syria-Palestine region, whic…