Skip to main content


In the Church, we stress the importance of testimony. Specifically, we stress how important it is to have a testimony of God, of Jesus Christ, and of the scriptures, often with an emphasis on the Book of Mormon. We stress the importance of having a testimony that Joseph Smith was divinely called as a prophet to restore the Church of Jesus Christ, and that the prophets and apostles that followed him are also called and chosen by God, and act as divine instruments in fulfilling His will. These are all important – and perhaps even vital – aspects of a testimony of the Restored Gospel.

Sometimes, however, such a testimony may not be enough. When anti-Mormons dredged up the dark aspects of LDS history – such as the short comings and imperfections of Joseph Smith, Brigham Young, or some other past or present LDS leader; or when an apostle’s message is not exactly “politically correct,” or perhaps even downright “offensive” in the eyes of some; or when we are exposed to the (quite often) bizarre anti-Mormon conspiracy concoctions built up on a few superficial facts (like the “hoards” of money the Church has and spends) presented with a heavy dose of negative (and sometimes even “demonic”) spin, our testimony of such things (listed above) may experience moments of peril.   

I have found in such moments, that another testimony is helpful: a testimony of love. Of the love that God has for us, certainly and most importantly, but also a testimony of the love that His chosen servants have for us as well. When we understand that the brethren love us and desire to sincerely serve us – their fellow man (and woman) – just as much as the sincerely strive to love and serve the Lord, then many of the things above are no longer such serious obstacles. Their human shortcomings seem less significant, their lack of tact at times can be overlooked, and such anti-Mormon conspiracies won’t appear even close to reasonable. Knowing that the brethren are sincere, devout, and loving men makes claims that they controlling, power-hungry con men seem absurd.

By no means am I saying that these issues should be non-factors, or become irrelevant in light of the “love of the brethren”; nor am suggesting that when one has a testimony of such love they are entirely unaffected by reasonable (or even more sensational) anti-Mormon presentations. Lastly, I am not suggesting that one ought not seek an intellectually satisfying solution to troubling issues – I have made it perfectly clear that I strongly believe in having a strong “intellectual testimony,” and that, while it is not the most important part of testimony, is it an important part nonetheless.

What I am saying is that by developing a strong testimony in the love the brethren have for you, it is easier to seek – and find – the intellectually satisfying answers with faith and confidence.  
To help build a testimony of that love, I recommend everyone read Jeffrey R. Holland’s talk from the October 2010 General Conference, “Because of You.” In reading this talk, I could not help but feel that sense of love of sincerity that Elder Holland – an apostle of the Lord – has for each member of the Church.

As one last additional note, sometimes people criticize the Church because “it” requires so much sacrifice – sacrifice of time, talents, income, wants, needs, etc. Indeed, to live and love and serve God and others always demands sacrifice. One thing I think that is helpful to remember – and Elder Holland’s talk hits home on this point as well – is that the leaders of the Church, from the Apostles and Prophets down to our local Bishops and Branch Presidents; from the men and woman asking us to make those sacrifices every six weeks in General Conference to the brothers and sisters asking us to make such sacrifices every week in Sacrament Meeting, have all spent their own lifetimes in dedicated service. They and their families have made the same – and greater – sacrifices that they lovingly ask of us. Joseph Smith knew, more than any of us, what it means to sacrifice everything for the Lord. Most importantly, I think it is important to remember that it is not “the Church” and it is not the brethren who as us to sacrifice and serve – but it the Lord (see Luke 14:26-27, 33).     


Popular posts from this blog

The 15 “Best Books” to Read BEFORE Having a Faith Crisis

Elder M. Russell Ballard recently stressed that it is important for Gospel educators to be well-informed on controversial topics, not only by studying the scriptures and Church materials, but also by reading “the best LDS scholarship available.” I personally think it is imperative in today’s world for every Latter-day Saint—not just Gospel educators—to make an effort to be informed on both controversial issues as well as knowing reliable faith-building information as well.
(Given that Elder Ballard’s CES address was published to general Church membership in the Ensign, I think it’s safe to say that Church leadership also feels this way.)
An important step in the process of getting informed is reading the 11 Gospel Topic essays and getting familiar with their contents. But what’s next? How can a person learn more about these and other topics? What are the “best books” (D&C 88:118) or “the best LDS scholarship available”?
Here are 15 suggestions.
1. Michael R. Ash, Shaken Faith S…

Responding to the New Video on Nahom as Archaeological Evidence for the Book of Mormon

Many of my (few) readers have probably already seen the new video by Book of Mormon Central on Nahom as archaeological evidence for the Book of Mormon, starring my good friend (and co-author on a related paper) Stephen Smoot. If you haven’t, check it out:

As usual, comments sections wherever this video is shared have been flooded by Internet ex-Mormons insisting this not evidence for the Book of Mormon. I’ve actually had a few productive conversations with some reasonable people who don’t think Nahom is, by itself, compelling evidence—and I can understand that. But the insistence that Nahom is not evidence at all is just, frankly, absurd. So I’ll just go ahead and preempt about 90% of future responses to this post by responding to the most common arguments against Nahom/NHM now:
1. The Book of Mormon is false, therefore there can be no evidence, therefore this is not evidence. First, this is circular reasoning. It assumes the conclusion (Book of Mormon is false) which the evidence pre…

New Paper on Isaiah in the Book of Mormon

Joseph M. Spencer, an adjunct professor at the BYU religion department, recently published a paper in the non-LDS peer review journal Relegere: Studies in Religion and Reception, titled, “Isaiah 52 in the Book of Mormon: Note’s on Isaiah’s Reception History.” Spencer is a young scholar who is doing exciting stuff on the Book of Mormon from a theological perspective.
The paper is described as follows in the abstract: Despite increasing recognition of the importance of Mormonism to American religion, little attention has been given to the novel uses of Isaiah in foundational Mormon texts. This paper crosses two lines of inquiry: the study of American religion, with an eye to the role played in it by Mormonism, and the study of Isaiah’s reception history. It looks at the use of Isa 52:7–10 in the Book of Mormon, arguing that the volume exhibits four irreducibly distinct approaches to the interpretation of Isaiah, the interrelations among which are explicitly meant to speak to nineteent…