Skip to main content


Back in April, I had a Facebook conversation with an ex-Mormon who is now some sort of protestant Christian (probably of an Evangelical variety). In this conversation, this individual confessed that when she was a Mormon and prayed about the Book of Mormon, she did feel something. She said, “I don't deny the good feeling. It was there. I just don't think it was God anymore. I think it was a false spirit. Do you believe this is possible?”

The following is my response to her question. She never responded back to me, so I do not know what her thoughts were concerning this answer. So, I just thought I would share it here thinking others may find it helpful in dealing with the same criticism, or that perhaps I may get some kind of response or feedback from someone who disagrees. 

Keep in mind that this response was written to a practicing Christian (as opposed to a non-Christian critic), so the truth of the Bible is assumed in my reasoning of why I feel that it is the Spirit of God that bears witness of the Book of Mormon. Also, I have slightly edited it to weed out mistakes in grammar and punctuation, etc. which I missed when I first wrote it. 


As far as if I think it’s possible that a false spirit is what answers the prayers of people who seek to know that truth of the Book of Mormon, or the LDS Church, I would have to answer no. Certainly false spirits exist, and I suppose it is theoretically possible, but based on my experience, I must dismiss this notion. I have several reasons for this. I'll assume you won't mind if I delve into the scriptures to explain my reasoning: 

1. Good Things Come From God: I'm sure you are familiar with the teaching in the Book of Mormon that “all things which are good cometh of God; and that which is evil cometh of the devil” and “that which is of God inviteth and enticeth to do good continually” (Moro. 7:12-13, also see verses 11-17). This is consistent with the principle that the Savior taught by analogy with the fig trees which bring forth good and bad fruit (see Matt. 7:16-18), namely that good comes from that which is good and of God, and bad evil things come from things that are corrupt and evil. The spiritual feelings I have experienced have been good feelings. They have led me to good things. Following the teachings of the Book of Mormon (and other scripture) and the LDS Church has resulted in more and more good in my life. Based in this simple principle, I must conclude that the good feelings are from God and not a false spirit.

2. Feelings Consistent with the Spirit of God: The Apostle Paul taught Timothy that “God hath not given us the spirit of fear; but of power, and of love, and of a sound mind.” (2 Tim 1:7) He likewise taught the Galatians that the fruits of the Spirit of God are (among other things) love, joy, peace, goodness, and faith (see Gal. 5:22-23). Jesus taught that the Holy Ghost was a comforter (see John 14:26), and that it would testify of truth (see John 16:13). Thus, the Holy Ghost (or Spirit of God) is a spirit of power, love, joy, peace, comfort, truth, goodness, faith and a sound mind. That description is consistent with the spiritual feelings I have experienced. They are likewise the feelings I feel coming from the Book of Mormon, and the LDS Church. In contrast, Paul mentioned a “spirit of fear” which is not of God. I have never felt fear from either the Book of Mormon or the LDS Church teachings. Paul also spoke to Timothy of “seducing spirits” which taught “doctrines of devils” (1 Tim 4:1). The things he says are taught by these spirits are (a) “speaking lies in hypocrisy” (b) “forbidding to marry” (c) and “abstaining from meats” (1 Tim. 4:2-3). I don't find any of these things coming from the spirit which I have felt. In fact, I find just the opposite. I got married back in August. I felt the Spirit confirm and encourage this decision, rather than “forbid to marry.” I have also felt this same Spirit encourage me to be honest at times when I have been tempted to “speak lies.” These are just some quick examples from my own experience. 

3. The Holy Ghost Testifies of Christ: Probably the most important test (at least in my opinion) given in the scriptures on how to determine the Spirit of God from false spirits is given by the Apostle John. He taught that to “try the spirits” we feel, we need to know if the spirit we feel testifies of Jesus Christ. If it does, then that spirit is God, but if not, then that is not God’s spirit (see 1 John 4:1-3). The Apostle Paul also taught that no one can honestly testify of Jesus Christ except by the Holy Ghost (see 1 Cor. 12:3). Jesus likewise taught that the Spirit testifies of Him (see John 15:26). Thus we have an important way to test the spirit which we feel. Does it testify of Jesus Christ? Because the Book of Mormon itself testifies of Jesus Christ, any spirit which testifies of the Book of Mormon inherently testifies of Christ (the same goes for Joseph Smith and the LDS Church). However, I do feel that it is important that you seek a testimony of Jesus Christ independent of any other testimony. The spirit felt testifying of Jesus Christ is the Spirit of God. I have felt the Spirit of God testify to me of Jesus Christ as my Savior, Redeemer, Lord and God. That same spirit has testified to me of the Book of Mormon, Joseph Smith, and the LDS Church. It is also the same spirit that has testified to me of the truth of the Bible. 

Sorry that was really long. But that lays out my experience and reasoning on the matter. If the spirit I felt testify of the Book of Mormon and the LDS Church was a false spirit, then I must reject the Bible, and Jesus Christ Himself, because the same spirit has given me my testimony of all those things. 

This is just my experience. I can't speak for you or anyone else, but I can say I have a hard time believing that the Spirit of God and a false spirit would testify of the same things.


  1. Richard Packham makes a decent case for how the spirit of Mormonism may be a false spirit:

  2. Also, I added you to my blogroll. You should actively try to attract a larger audience, Neal. I think your blog is a good read and it deserves it.

  3. Thanks Jon. I would like to seek a wider audience, but I just haven't figured out how to that.

    I appreciate the positive feedback and support you give me (although you likely disagree with most of my views).

  4. The key is shameless promotion. Ha ha. Promote. Promote. Promote. On Facebook. On other people's sites. Everywhere.

    I've found the most effective tool that brings traffic to my site is Reddit has a huge atheist/ex-Mormon community. You may have a harder time utilizing Reddit, however, because the LDS community is pretty small there.

    And once you get an audience, it's important to post regularly.

  5. Neal,

    I like the argument you made. Unfortunately, I don't think it changed your facebook acquaintance's feelings, otherwise you would have had a response.

    As for promoting your site, I agree with Jon. For my football sites the best thing is to find discussion boards that are on topic to what you write and participate. Many that I have found have "signature lines" where you can put whatever you want as your signature. Make your signature your web address. When you make a post, put a link on the discussion boards. People on the discussion boards are die hards and will read anything they can get.

  6. I find it interesting that a recent poll of Mormons found that over 98% of those questioned believe in the resurrection of Jesus Christ as a literal historical fact. Not bad for a group of people led to that conclusion by a false spirit. I have had a Baptist minister admit to me that he didn't consider that there was room in the doctrine of the trinity for an embodied Christ. I doubt I will ever hear that from the mouth of a Latter-day Saint. In the mouth of two or more witnesses shall every word be established.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Nephite History in Context 4: The Iron Dagger of King Tutankhamun

Editor’s Note: This is the fourth contribution to my new series Nephite History in Context: Artifacts, Inscriptions, and Texts Relevant to the Book of Mormon. Check out the really cool (and official, citable) PDF version here. To learn more about this series, read the introduction here. To find other posts in the series, see here.
The Iron Dagger of King Tutankhamun
The discovery of King Tutankhamun’s tomb in 1922 was a worldwide sensation, and to this day is widely regarded as one of the greatest archaeological discoveries of all-time due to the veritable treasure trove of artifacts found inside. The treasure was so great that to this day many of the items have yet to be studied. Likewise, Tutankhamun (ca. 1336–1327 bc) remains the best-known Pharaoh of Egypt in popular culture today, but details about his actual reign and accomplishments are still generally unknown among the public. Some are aware that he ascended to the throne as a mere child, about 8 years old, but few r…

Nephite History in Context 3: Vered Jericho Sword

Editor’s Note: This is the third contribution to my new series Nephite History in Context: Artifacts, Inscriptions, and Texts Relevant to the Book of Mormon. Check out the really cool (and official, citable) PDF version here. To learn more about this series, read the introduction here. To find other posts in the series, see here.
Vered Jericho Sword
Vered Jericho was a small ancient Israelite fortress first excavated in the winter of 1982 by archaeologist Avraham Eitan. It’s located roughly 3.7 miles (6 km) south of Jericho proper, on the northern side of Wadi es-Suweid. The walls still stand over 6 and half feet tall (2 m) and nearly 3 feet (0.9 m) wide, with two towers on each corner flanking the gate. Inside the fort is a courtyard and two dwelling structures. The fort may have also had cultic or ritual functions as a “high place” (beit bamah). It dates to the late seventh to early sixth century BC, and was destroyed by fire, quite likely in either the Babylonian siege of …

Responding to the New Video on Nahom as Archaeological Evidence for the Book of Mormon

Many of my (few) readers have probably already seen the new video by Book of Mormon Central on Nahom as archaeological evidence for the Book of Mormon, starring my good friend (and co-author on a related paper) Stephen Smoot. If you haven’t, check it out:

As usual, comments sections wherever this video is shared have been flooded by Internet ex-Mormons insisting this not evidence for the Book of Mormon. I’ve actually had a few productive conversations with some reasonable people who don’t think Nahom is, by itself, compelling evidence—and I can understand that. But the insistence that Nahom is not evidence at all is just, frankly, absurd. So I’ll just go ahead and preempt about 90% of future responses to this post by responding to the most common arguments against Nahom/NHM now:
1. The Book of Mormon is false, therefore there can be no evidence, therefore this is not evidence. First, this is circular reasoning. It assumes the conclusion (Book of Mormon is false) which the evidence pre…