Skip to main content


LDS apologist Jeff Lindsey quotes an email received once from someone who was questioning the LDS Church’s right to claim the label of Christian. In that email, the unidentified critic says:

“The beliefs that you profess are not commonly considered ‘Christian’.... Let us not care who's theology is correct, if in fact either one is. My thought is, simply, that people have ideas that they instinctively associate with the word ‘Christian’ that members of the LDS church do not. A few examples would be their version of the trinity, works not being necessary for salvation, and not being able to achieve Godhood because of the uniqueness of their God. If that is the case, then isn't presenting yourself as a ‘Christian’ to someone who is uninformed of LDS beliefs deceptive?”

They then go on to say,

“Please understand that I am only concerned with allowing truthful communication between members and non-members of the Church to occur. Honestly, I think that the LDS church as a whole needs to stop trying to apply the term 'Christian' to itself and invent a new one, just for the sake of honest communication.”

Lindsey, of course, offers his own response to this question[1]. But, since reading this question several months ago, I have wished to express a few thoughts on it. 

First of all, I readily grant that there are things believed by Latter-Day Saints that are not commonly associated with being “Christian.” However, I dispute that this is problematic for communication. On my mission, when talking with various people of various faiths, it was not all that difficult to clearly communicate our different views on the Godhead, salvation, and several other doctrines. These kinds of differences generally came up in the first conversation, right there on the doorstep! In fact, we freely brought them up lots of the time. In no instance that I can remember did anybody feel we were dishonest in representing ourselves as Christians upon discovering these differences.

On the other hand, being in the “Bible Belt” we certainly ran into plenty of real life anti-Mormons who already knew (or thought they knew) our beliefs on those issues. In such cases, no matter how much we insisted that Jesus Christ was at the center of our faith, they refused to acknowledge us as Christians.

Now, if “honest communication” is our aim – as this unnamed critic professes – then let’s consider the one idea that is most “instinctively associated” with the label of Christian. That is, belief in Jesus Christ as Lord, and Savior, and Redeemer, the prophesied Messiah. This is a belief certainly held by Latter-Day Saints, and (again thinking back to on my mission) it is really the only idea I found being “instinctively” and consistently associated with the label Christian by all the lay Christians I had so many discussions with. At the same time, the natural association we have with a label like non-Christian or even Cult is that they don’t believe in Jesus Christ. Now, then, does that sound like “honest communication” to you?

Often when we ran into people who had been told we are a non-Christian cult, then overcoming that stigma and convincing them that we do in fact put our trust and faith in Jesus Christ for salvation was almost an insurmountable obstacle. I remember one girl we met with three times in Portsmouth, VA, whose family kept telling her that we were not Christians. Every time we met with her we had to re-convince her that we believed in Jesus Christ. We showed her several passages in the Book of Mormon every time. It always took the whole time we were with her to finally get her to believe us when we said we believed in Jesus Christ. As a result, we couldn’t get anywhere further with her, and so we had to just stop meeting with her.

My point is simply this: If “honest communication” is the goal, then it is more honest to label Latter-Day Saints as Christians rather than non-Christians, because the ideas most instinctively associated by the label of non-Christian (primarily a lack of belief in Jesus Christ), is far less accurate (and therefore dishonest) then any misconceptions that may arise out of Mormons calling themselves Christians.




  1. We may have discussed this before, but do you consider polygamists "Mormon"?

  2. I don't think you and I have discussed it before, but I have shared my thoughts on that issue on another blog (

    In short, I consider anyone who accepts Joseph Smith as a prophet and the BoM as scripture to be Mormon. I assume you mean polygamists who broke off from the LDS Church to continue the practice of poloygamy (since there very well could be other polygamist out there who have and make no affiliation with Mormonism). Yes, I would consider them to be "Mormons."

    Of course, my typical use of the term "Mormon" and "Mormonism" on this blog is in regards to the LDS Church.

  3. Ha ha, that's where I remember your talking about this issue! Yeah, I've already read your post there.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Nephite History in Context 1: Jerusalem Chronicle

Editor’s Note: This is the first contribution to my new series Nephite History in Context: Artifacts, Inscriptions, and Texts Relevant to the Book of Mormon. Check out the really cool (and official, citable) PDF version here. To learn more about this series, read the introduction here. To find other posts in the series, see here
Jerusalem Chronicle (ABC 5/BM 21946)
The so-called “Babylonian Chronicles” are an important collection of brief historical reports from Mesopotamia, found in Iraq in the late-19th century.1 They are written on clay tablets in Akkadian using cuneiform script, and cover much of the first millennium BC, although several tablets are missing or severely damaged, leaving gaps in the record. One tablet, colloquially known as the “Jerusalem Chronicle” (ABC 5/BM 21946),2 provides brief annal-like reports of the early reign of Nebuchadrezzar II (biblical Nebuchadnezzar), including mention of his invasion of Jerusalem.
Biblical sources report that King Jehoiac…

Nephite History in Context 2a: Apocryphon of Jeremiah

Editor’s Note: This is the first part of the second contribution to my new series Nephite History in Context: Artifacts, Inscriptions, and Texts Relevant to the Book of Mormon. Check out the really cool (and official, citable) PDF version here. To learn more about this series, read the introduction here. To find other posts in the series, see here
Apocryphon of Jeremiah (4Q385a)
Between 1947 and 1956, a few well preserved scrolls and tens of thousands of broken fragments were found scattered across eleven different caves along the northwest shores of the Dead Sea near Qumran. Now known as the Dead Sea Scrolls, they are arguably the most significant discovery ever made for the study of the Bible and the origins of Judaism and Christianity. Among the writings found are the earliest copies of nearly every Old Testament book, many of the known apocryphal and pseudepigraphic works, and several other texts discovered for the first time at Qumran. Altogether, more than 900 differe…

The 15 “Best Books” to Read BEFORE Having a Faith Crisis

Elder M. Russell Ballard recently stressed that it is important for Gospel educators to be well-informed on controversial topics, not only by studying the scriptures and Church materials, but also by reading “the best LDS scholarship available.” I personally think it is imperative in today’s world for every Latter-day Saint—not just Gospel educators—to make an effort to be informed on both controversial issues as well as knowing reliable faith-building information as well.
(Given that Elder Ballard’s CES address was published to general Church membership in the Ensign, I think it’s safe to say that Church leadership also feels this way.)
An important step in the process of getting informed is reading the 11 Gospel Topic essays and getting familiar with their contents. But what’s next? How can a person learn more about these and other topics? What are the “best books” (D&C 88:118) or “the best LDS scholarship available”?
Here are 15 suggestions.
1. Michael R. Ash, Shaken Faith S…